Category: The Human Zoo

  • Cynicism and LinkedIn

    Cynicism and LinkedIn

    What makes a cynic? Reason and experience in life or the cold hand of genetic inheritance?

    Are cynics just born? Or do they become imbued with cynicism as they travel through life and become convinced by absurdity?

    According to Wikipedia, a contemporary cynic has an attitude characterized by a general distrust of others’ motives. “A cynic may have a general lack of faith or hope in the human species or people motivated by ambition, desire, greed, gratification, materialism, goals, and opinions that a cynic perceives as vain, unobtainable, or ultimately meaningless and therefore deserving of ridicule or admonishment.”

    In ancient Greece, where the term originated, Diogenes lived in a barrel on the streets of ancient Athens.  Again as per Wikipedia, ancient cynics believed “people can gain happiness by rigorous training and by living in a way which is natural for themselves, rejecting all conventional desires for wealth, power, sex, and fame. Instead, they were to lead a simple life free from all possessions”.

    The cynic should be using LinkedOut, not LinkedIn.  I was browsing LinkedIn this morning and my immediate and strong emotion was one of cynicism.

    Behavior in life is truly fractal. We all spring from the same simple cells which first divided to form life millions of years ago; and so it is of little surprise perhaps that the behavior of life is fractal from the smallest microbe upwards.  Life fights to the death. Bacteria struggles to overcome and dominate. The fungi battle against competing species to achieve dominance so they can fruit and spread their spores. The fox kills and eats the chicken to survive and spread his selfish gene and so on up to the level of the human race.

    Business is a battleground. In some countries of the world, life is still largely physical and hence violence is too.  The rule of law is such in many of the world’s ghastly corners that humans can still behave like the fox or the jackal. Or indeed like bacteria or fungi. They club and fight and kill for land and possessions so that they too can pass on their unworthy genes. And so on into the next unworthy and unpleasant generation.

    In the more “civilized” West, fractal violence has had to adapt to a better enforced and more sophisticated rule of law.

    Social media has become the latest battleground where, instead of clubbing your fellow man to steal his food, shelter and wife you have to convince him to part with all three without violence.

    Commerce is the new violence. In the beginning was the mouth and the tooth and the claw. In the beginning was physical violence. And since behavior is fractal, for most species on earth outside of humanity, violence is still the means to survive and prosper.

    Think of cancer cells.

    But oh so clever man with his gift (or curse?) of consciousness now uses business to conquer and survive. Where he can, man will still use genuine violence in business. He seeks to ruin his competitor and drive him out of business. He seeks to convince the hapless and foolish consumer that his goods or services have value and more value than those of his competitors.

    Nowhere is Darwinism more evident than in the world of finance. The tooth and the claw have been replaced by marketing and sales.  The bookies and the forex dealers, the stock brokers and the sellers of investment systems must at one level know that they are selling poison and destruction but they don’t give a damn. If they did they would not survive.

    How can any man in good conscience sell bets or betting services when he knows that ruin is the outcome for the consumer? How can men sell endless seminars promising to teach fools to trade when they must know they are selling moonshine and bullshit?

    How can the forex broker and execution only stock broker fill his website with useless trading tips and promises when he knows (or ought to know) that he is selling snake-oil with the intention of transferring wealth (and hence Darwinian survival) from the punters’ pockets to his own?

    Someone quite rightly recently admonished me by pointing out that there are good things happening in the world.

    I must scour LinkedOut for good people doing good things. They must be there.

  • ChristianMingle.com

    ChristianMingle.com

    A kind friend sent me what I took to be a flyer for ChristianMingle.com, which appears to be a sex and dating site for Christians.

    Apparently my friend believes I lack both god and sex and he is right on both counts, so I am most grateful for his kind solicitations.

    There is even a movie based on the website.

    According to Wikipedia:

    Christian Mingle was launched in 2001 by Spark Networks. The site has over 16 million members. In July 2016, Christian Mingle began accommodating gay men and women.

    Ah, so that’s OK then. But apparently there are over 11 genders now, so perhaps ChristianMingle has some catching up to do.

    You will doubtless be pleased to hear that:

    Spark Networks  is a leading global dating company with a widening portfolio of premium & freemium apps. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol ‘LOV’”.

    Intrigued and attracted by the joint idea of god and free sex I signed up for the UK version. Sadly, given my advanced age, I was presented with a motley selection of  ugly old ducks who were doubtless also having problems with both sex and god. Although some had worn better than others and would perhaps offer an interesting evening out with extras.

    Those with a non conventional Christian or other background will  be pleased to hear that Spark offers succor to Jews, Latter Day Saint Singles and Christian Adventists.

    I was most disappointed to discover Spark does not offer “Muslim Mingle” or “Taliban Mingle” but perhaps these committed American capitalists will reach out to other sex starved religious devotees in due course. Buddhist Mingle, Sikh Mingle, Atheist Mingle. I’d better put out a buy recommendation on the stock.

     

     

  • To be a Prisoner

    To be a Prisoner

    I spent the week incarcerated in Calais. It lead me to contemplate the unimaginable horror of prison life.

    I must not exaggerate.  My mother in law had broken her hip on the first day of her holiday and was taken by ambulance to the Centre Hospitalier in Calais.  She is 88 and my father in law 90.  We took a vastly expensive last minute fare on the Eurotunnel to offer such assistance as our limited command of the French language permitted. We remained binned up in the Holiday Inn in Calais for a week, while operations were undertaken by the highly proficient French surgeon and excellent nursing care provided to the point where the poor lady was fit to be repatriated by ambulance.

    The incarceration was by dint of the fact the elderly lady needed constant visits to bolster her moral. Not of strong mind in recent years and with no short term memory, she was very fearful and, frankly, was lucky to survive such was her state.

    So we trundled the four miles to the hospital and back from the seafront hostelry four or five times a day. We barely saw daylight or felt the wind on our faces. the food became monotonous as did, needless to say, the hospital.

    I looked up all the dismal French plays I had studied in my school years. Les Chaises was probably the most apt, closely matched by Huis Clos.  Oh and let’s not forget Waiting for Godot. Satre, Ionesco, Brecht, Beckett…and the dismal Camus.  What cheer the thought of that lot brought to my week. Sitting in a windowless room for eternity only to discover, eventually, that I was dead.

    We were released today and both suddenly asked what it must be like for those banged up in jail.

    Our week was luxury indeed by comparison, a mere walk in the park. Real chokey is not a laughing matter.

    A few days before our unexpected holiday treat, I had been chatting to the fellow who came to mend our fridge. His wife works as a nurse in a Category B prison on the Isle of Sheppey.  The island itself represents nothing if not a prison, never mind the bars. Fans of Charles Dickens may remember Abel Magwich who did time on a prison hulk a few miles up river from Sheppey.  What a place for a prison – like Dartmoor it is a place for the damned, a veritable hell on earth. Flat, grey, windswept, sitting in a miserable river estuary.  Suitable only for birds of the feathered variety, although god knows how even they can put up with the place.

    But I digress. The nurse was presented on her first day, a few years back, with a vision out of Dante’s Inferno. A real life scene from Hieronymus Bosch.  One lag had committed a cardinal sin – he had nicked a packet of cigarettes.  His reward was to be sliced under the arm pits and hung up on the wall by a coat hanger put through his neck. That punishment turned out to be mild – violence orders of magnitude worse is apparently meted out with terrible regularity. One long term prisoner was released from jail after a particularly savage beating. It was a mercy release – he was beaten so badly he did not have long to live. He was crippled so severely they just let the poor fellow go. In his condition he was a threat to nobody.

    The trouble with me is I am a sucker for reform. I can not join in the almost universal condemnation of the criminal fraternity, however psychopathic and, some would argue, “evil” they may be.  Or some of them at any rate.

    I remember seeing a TV program on psychopaths. Their brains are wired differently. Violence would mean nothing to them. They are amoral in that they are simply unable to appreciate their behavior is wrong or harmful. Funnily enough the presenter himself was a relative of Lizzie Borden and discovered on scanning that he had a psychopath’s brain. Happily, in his case, the condition had not been triggered. His family must have been much relieved not to be chopped up by Lizzie’s relative.

    The depression, misery and frustration I felt this last week put me in mind of the prisoners and their dilemma.  I was tied. Unable to go home, unable to walk on the beach, fiddle with my computer, sing or dance or …….whatever.

    Imagine being banged up in the Isle Of Sheppey. Or the Scrubbs. Or Dartmoor or any of those other hells on earth.

    Is it any surprise that their is no redemption to be had? Is it any surprise that the rate of re-offence is so high? Such peoples’ minds must be turned, corrupted, destroyed by their incarceration.

    Of course many of them were not pleasant people to begin with. Their violence on the outside the mirror image of their savagery when put behind bars.

    But those of us who have considered such matters as determinism might question whether the criminals’ behavior is actually their “fault” in the first place. Many a reputed scientist, including the late lamented Stephen Hawking, believe that we are mere robots with no free will or culpability for our actions.

    We humans are in general not a pleasant species but I believe that it is very largely not our fault. Leaving aside the question of free will, my own normally fairly reasonable behavior was badly affected by the circumstances of the past week. Feeling trapped and imprisoned, I became deeply disoriented, bad tempered and depressed. Although I managed to restrain myself from chopping anyone up or hanging them up with a coat hanger through the neck. Much as I may have been tempted.

    But picture the destitute kids from the worst slums. Consider the conditions they live in,  the futures to which they must look forward. Is it any surprise that they embark on a career of crime and violence. There but for the grace of god…..

    Our society is broken. Our species in broken. We are mere an animals who have evolved to kill and maim to survive. It is high time we realized this.  The time will come when we may be able to eradicate violence. To alter our behavior through genetic engineering.

    Until such time perhaps we could make a more genuine effort to help the criminal, the destitute, the untermensch.

    I realize I am a bleeding heart liberal, a wishy washy Guardian sympathizer.  But I do wish there was a better way to treat the outlaws, the violent, the inadequate.

  • Is Sex Dirty?

    Is Sex Dirty?

    Objectively, as a mere means of reproduction, it is hard to see how sex can be considered disgusting. And yet many humans consider it so.

    We are driven by many natural impulses. Chemical reactions tell us when we need to refuel with drink or food. Further chemical reactions create the physical urge to eject waste.  Many find the ejection part unpalatable, and perhaps understandably so. We are reason, we are thoughts, ideas and lofty ideals. Yet even the Queen must pee and poo – albeit it in a gold plated bog.

    Eating and drinking, and waste disposal are essential for the preservation of an existing life. Sex is essential for the continuance of many species.  Why should we not enjoy it?

    I suspect more people find sex repellent than going to the lavatory.

    Objectively then, is sex disgusting? Should we feel ridden by guilt and wracked by existential anxiety because we enjoy a good bonk? Or the reverse? Should we feel guilty because we avoid sex like the plague and consider it embarrassing and disgusting?

    I don’t think it is a simple question and under or over indulgence can each play their part in wrecking a relationship.

    But I do find it pitiable and absurd that society as a whole has always (or mostly always) surrounded and smothered sex with taboo.  The Victorians were outwardly so prudish they covered the legs of their pianos with cotton doilies; and yet under the covers many led lives as steamy as the most enlightened free love hippy of the 1960s.

    Much hypocrisy  surrounds and has always surrounded the enjoyment of sex. Children may be taught by their parents that sex is dirty and to be avoided – or to be done occasionally and furtively in the dark for the purposes of reproduction only.  Religion has played its guilty role – traditionally many religious societies have made it mandatory to despise and avoid sex. And to indulge in self flagellation and cold baths to defeat the evil impulse.

    And yet how damaging this perverted attitude has been over the centuries. Such impulses are not expunged but merely driven underground. A more open and encouraging attitude to the enjoyment of regular sex among consenting adults might have done much to prevent the horrors and perversions we have seen in recent years.

    The Victorians liked to sweep such smut under the carpet but under the surface, whatever their pious exterior, their natural impulses would out.

    And what of pornography and brothels? Provided they entail no under age sex and no forced participation (no sex slaves) then undoubtedly these can cause no harm. Except of course to sex starved nutters who have some warped sense of moral outrage.  Indeed they can achieve much good.

    Many a marriage might benefit where one or other of the partners feels disgust – the other could pop off and have a bit of fun without harm being done to the relationship.  As one dear old Grannie put it “Its only sex, dear”.

    Indeed brothels and pornography are an important outlet – freely available sex would do much to counter the horrible and secretive abuse so common in society. Even the awful Jimmy Saville might have been able to slake his thirst in a less harmful way in some sanitized and legal brothel.

    It is no more perverted to enjoy sex than it is to deny its wholesomeness. Sex is no dirtier than emptying your bowels or your bladder. And anyway some people find even those natural actions quite enjoyable.

    It may not be highbrow, it may not have the finesse of the more intellectual areas of human endeavor.

    But those who find it disgusting should not impose their feelings on those who do not. My advice is to get out there and have some harmless fun.

    “It’s only sex dear”!

     

  • The “Influencer”

    The “Influencer”

    There can be few callings which I hold is such low esteem as that of the “Influencer”.

    Apparently, an influencer is “an individual who has the power to affect the purchase decisions of others because of his/her authority, knowledge, position or relationship with his/her audience”.

    I picture the male influencer as a man of around 40, sporting a brown and overly wide chalk stripe suit. On his feet are likely to be found a pair of grey basket work winkle-pickers.  He will have a orange tinted face, a perma-tan, mined presumably from some tub of ointment or procured from that most bizarre of salons, the tanning shop.

    His voice will be unctuous and over friendly – for he is the close relative of the “Salesman”. He will appear over confident, bumptious and very probably ignorant. His education will have been from the University of Life, since conventional universities do not yet offer education or training in “Influencing”. No doubt that shortcoming will end soon. At some college near you, a three year degree course in “influencing” will soon become available.

    It’s all to do with Social Media apparently.

    They say that “influencers” fall into the following categories:

    1. Celebrities
    2. Industry experts and thought leaders
    3. Bloggers and content creators
    4. Micro Influencers

    What the hell is a “thought leader”? You got me there. No idea I’m afraid. Perhaps it’s some horrible new invention by the US Military or the CIA. Brainwashing?

    And “celebrities”? Women with enhanced breasts and huge buttocks married to swarthy gentlemen wearing gold chains who drive large white Rolls Royces? Yes, I think that must be it.

    Anyway, these awful people blog and vlog. Vlogging is apparently blogging but making it doubly ghastly by videoing their message.

    Men in their brown suits and women with their protruding exuberance will stare out at you and unashamedly try to convince you to part with cash for loathsome tat you have no need for and don’t want in the first place.

    ICOs (International Coin Offerings) represent my earliest memory of the “influencer”. An over zealous little puppet was recommending that we should buy entirely useless tokens and altcoins which would crash and burn shortly after launch. The odious little shark was getting paid by the issuers to push their useless junk and thanks to “fomo” (yuk!) his horrible tactics proved most efficacious.

    So there you have it. The “Influencer”.   All you need to know really. If you recognize one switch the blighter off immediately. Smash your “smartfone”, abandon the internet (or at least use it for something useful).

    The “Influencer” turns out to be nothing but a modern interpretation of the grubby, odious salesman.

     

  • The Benefits of People Watching

    The Benefits of People Watching

    If you are going to talk to people at all, make sure they are people you do not know and are foreign as regards your class, tribe or social milieu.

    Michael Mosely ran an excellent program on BBC about the benefits of doing new things. Even buttering your toast on a different side to the marmalade counts, so sitting outside Waitrose waiting for my Fulham hausfrau this morning made an ideal opportunity to dash into the unknown.

    I detest socializing. I hate parties. There is nothing worse than the shallow cocktail party, swapping inanities with fools you don’t want to see and in whom you have an interest of less than zero.  Ditto dinner parties. Yuk. Small talk is such crap.

    But the chance encounter with a stranger, ah, that is something to relish. To enjoy, to benefit from.

    Whether your counterpart feels equal benefit, I am not qualified to say. I hope so, but who knows? It may well be that I bore the a**s off such unfortunates, who run home to tell their wives, partners, girlfriends, dogs, and children about this horrendous nutter who accosted them on the train/bus/pavement this morning.

    No matter, it does me good and I will generously hope likewise for my victims.

    I go out of my way these days to court the unusual. I find most benefit when at first glance I feel some measure of distaste or disapproval for my target. I am always aware that such distaste is entirely unjustified and so it inevitably proves to be.  The shifty looking foreigner on the awful tube journey from City airport, who shames me by offering some old bird a seat, while I jealousy guard my treasured spot. The smelly youth with a woolly hairdo (and equally awful dirty woolen hat) who performs some gratuitous kindness to some unfortunate in his path.

    So this morning, sitting on the courtesy seats outside Waitrose, there trundles out of the store a bloke in a wheelchair. Laden with shopping, a Waitrose helper deposits him at a table on the pavement, where he re-arranges his purchases around convenient spots in and on his chariot of fire.

    And out dashes a shop-lifter pursued and shouted at by one of the staff. Followed by some curious lady begging for mercy of some sort. An accomplice perhaps, intent on a free chop for her supper.  The poor woman was clearly not “all there”. She looked normal enough – cleanly and reasonably dressed in jeans and a pleasant top.  But she was a few sandwiches short of the full picnic. A burnished button on the blazer. One of the blunter knives in the draw.

    I felt drawn to help her.  To speak to her at least, to try to calm her ravings. Happily the Waitrose staff treated her well and sent her on her way.  Perhaps she was not an accomplice after all.

    And then the “Man in the Wheelchair” and I strike up discourse, both equally alarmed by the fracas and its meaning (if any). By any reasonable measure, the poor fellow had been well and truly dumped on by life.

    A gay choirboy in some remote northern province, he had been interfered with by the choirmaster. Later in life he became a successful chartered accountant before being struck down by HIV some 30 years ago. He had recently had his leg chopped off at the knee (for reasons I failed to ascertain) and had suffered mental health issues apparently at the hands of a devious and manipulative partner (life, not business).

    There was a mania about him, an edge to his voice, his demeanor. As if, like the accomplice shoplifter, he lived somewhere just on the very borders of sanity.

    And my role in all this? My attitude? The benefits of the conversation? Well for one I hope I was kind to him, I hope I offered him a little normality, a no strings conversation in a world which for him had become increasingly isolated.

    For me? He was new, different. He had a story to tell, his life a coracle on the rough and brutal reality we live in.   I felt gratitude, about all sorts of things. I had made a connection with a fellow human, where neither of us had any angle. No gain was to be made (certainly not financial). A chance meeting with a random stranger who seemed grateful to tell his story to somebody who was ready to listen.

    My day has been made all the better for it.  I recommend you accost a total stranger somewhere near you today. You will both benefit, I promise.

     

  • Billions -Faint Disgust?

    Billions -Faint Disgust?

    I watched an episode of Season 2 of Billions last night and was left with an unaccustomed feeling of repulsion.

    According to Wikipedia:

    The series is loosely based on the activities of Preet Bharara, the former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and his legal battles with hedge fund manager Steve Cohen of S.A.C. Capital Advisors.

    I had watched the first series with much pleasure but perhaps since that time I have grown older and wiser. And not a little more philosophic.

    Every character in the show is repulsive from the vulgar checkbook waving wife of Bobby Axelrod, to the driven and unpleasant district attorney who seeks to make his mark by crucifying the hedge fund king.

    What particularly struck me last night was the the awfulness of the motivational speeches. If your work life is driven by these, then no wonder we live in the paradise we have created for ourselves.

    Everyone is the show is portrayed as ruthless and horrible, greedy and venal. Surely such characterization  has to be parody?

    The great glory of the show, in visual terms, has to be Maggie Siff as Wendy Rhoades. Wow! What a beautiful woman. She is the sexy in-house coach at Axe Capital, and rather unfortunately married to the vicious district attorney out to crucify her boss.

    She may be beautiful but what she has to say is brutal and tiresome. And vulgar. There is talk of Viagra and stiffness, both of which are needed, apparently, to succeed in the hedge fund world. Same with Bobby’s speeches – if ever there was an exposition of the sublimated violence in business and capital, you need look no further than Bobby.

    Its all savage, violent, sexy, drug fueled and (surprise!) materialistic.

    How must it be when your every waking thought is the urge to conquer? When money is all you seek? When culture, erudition, philosophy, if used at all, are used merely in the pursuit of the material.

    Its all show, showtime, vulgarity. Art is to hang on the wall, never mind its meaning. Beauty is to be pressed into service, used, not for any intrinsic quality, but in the pursuance of more.

    Of course this is all fiction – or so I assume. People are not that ghastly, tasteless and gross in the real world.  They do not, surely, talk like that, speak like that, think like that? Or do they?

    Perhaps it is because I lurch towards the end of my life that my thoughts turn to the intangible. Perhaps, way back, I had ambitions to be Bobby. Perhaps once upon a time, way back, when I found myself miscast (dramatically so) as an investment banker, I sought to emulate Bobby.

    If so, then age is not without its advantages. As drama, as entertainment its a good romp. I’m not at all sure I can stomach too many more episodes though.

  • Shock and Awe – Battersea Power Station

    Shock and Awe – Battersea Power Station

    How small and insignificant I felt, grovelling at the foot of this seventh wonder of the world.

    Huge, massive, unreal, apocalyptic even. Vast power hammers sending vibrations through the ground like earth tremors, cranes reaching to the sky, swinging manically in all directions.  Men in hard hats scrabbling like ants over a forest ant hill.

    The original architecture, the central power house is even more frightening, if anything, than the Malaysian funded luxury sprouting up all around it.

    Built at the height of the Soviet Union, the Art Deco monstrosity reminded me of nothing less than a Stakhanovite campaign. This behemoth ate coal and spun mysterious electro magnetic forces in it interior. It belched poison into the atmosphere through its 4 upturned table legs.

    Human workers shoveling coal and mending turbines were cogs in a vast wheel of production, which would have fitted all too well into one of Comrade Joseph’s 5 Year Plans.

    Is it capitalism or communism? Is there a difference? Both are monolithic, uncaring structures where the few dominate the many. There may be humans at the top, but at the bottom it feels nothing but a vast machine, churning and burning, eating and consuming.  Inhuman, dystopian.

    The vastness and indifference of the universe is one thing. There, no guiding hand other than cold mathematics spins the fate of galaxies. There, the nuclear force of stars belches energy untroubled by intellect or human emotion.

    A vast collective enterprise like Battersea Power Station feels very different.  And yet in some ways eerily similar. It was “caused”. Unlike the universe. It was designed and built by human will, human intelligence.

    And yet the result feels not dissimilar.  There is something distinctly inhuman about an industrial enterprise on this scale. The individual becomes irrelevant, mere fodder or fuel to the greater purpose. Alexey Stakhanov indeed.

    And what of the new Battersea Power station? Now that workers build luxury and wealth for mysterious Malaysian overlords, does this eater of workers, this leviathan of the deep have a different feel to it?

    I would argue not. An enterprise so vast is difficult to comprehend. The investors or residents who buy the egg box flats are perhaps the new workers. Instead of shoveling coal and crawling around inside turbines, they slave in offices to pay their mortgages so that the mysterious owners can reap energy from the project. Not electro-magnetic force these days – just money. Equally powerful in our human world.

    So yes, shock and awe. There is no doubt a steely, industrial beauty here. But it is still, and will remain, an ants nest with an overlord. A queen bee, a politariat. The purchasers of the new urban luxury may not be the slaves of old, but slaves they are nonetheless.  They feed their mortgages, their banks rather than the coal boilers.

    A great seething mass of frenetic activity. A vast consumption, a huge turnover of growth and GDP and resources.

    Are we better off for it? Or are we still Stakhanovites feeding some giant collective delusion?

  • Does Evil Exist?

    Does Evil Exist?

    In the absence of conscious beings with free will, morality can not exist.  Picture a universe of infinite violence such as our own with no sentient life.  Is the extreme destruction of a super nova evil? Is a tsunami evil, or an earthquake? Surely not.

    Now assume a universe with consciousness and beings able to cause acts of violence and cruelty.

    Destruction of itself can not, presumably, be deemed evil (even if caused by sentient beings) unless other sentient beings suffer. And even then intent must be shown. Accidental destruction causing suffering can not be evil. There must have been an intent to cause suffering. Or callous carelessness without regard to the consequences.

    We know that consciousness exists even if we do not understand what it is. I think, therefore I am.

    We do not know whether free will exists. Without free will there can be no intent to cause harm and suffering. Nor indeed to cause good or happiness.

    But we must act as if free will does exist. We must believe free will exists. Not to do so makes all our thoughts, words and deeds pointless.

    So on those assumptions does evil exist? Does good exist? Are there any moral imperatives or are we free to interpret morality as we desire?

    I argue very strongly that moral imperatives do exist in a universe with sentience and free will.

    The most important moral imperative is to abolish suffering. To refrain from causing suffering to conscious beings. I can not, will not accept, as I have seen argued recently, that good and evil are subject to change and interpretation by different societies in different ages.

    This has absolutely nothing to do with a belief or disbelief in a deity. We do not need a deity to explain to us what suffering is and to tell us it is wrong.

    And please, please do not tell me that society of any age or geography genuinely believed that the barbarity handed out to their fellow men was justified. Was not “evil”. If they did so believe then very clearly they were wrong. Good and evil do very obviously exist in our universe and it is our duty to espouse the former and eschew the latter.

    We are not robots, surely? And on that assumption our duty is to prevent suffering.

    I recently sang in a Passion by the contemporary English composer Howard Goodall.

    The lyrics were profound (even if the music was not destined to become one of my personal favorites).

    In his Lamentations are found the words of William Wilberforce, spoken in the House of Commons on 18th April 1791, “You may choose to look the other way but you can never say again that you did not know”.

    Please do not tell me that among sentient beings with free will, morals are relative.

  • Processed for the Slaughterhouse.

    Processed for the Slaughterhouse.

    In the featured image, Leni Riefenstahl and a camera crew stand in front of Hitler’s car during the 1934 rally in Nuremberg.  Note the eerie order in the street, the crowd carefully controlled in the gutters to express their awe of the military behemoth.

    Earlier, in 1927, Fritz Lang had produced the unsettling film  Metropolis, where wealthy industrialists and business magnates and their top employees reign from high-rise towers, while underground-dwelling workers toil to operate the great machines that power the city.  And lo, a few years later……

    It struck me today while travelling from Zurich to London by air, that the way our society is now organised lays us wide open to dystopia in the not too distant future.

    Airports, airplanes and their employees seem to be closely related to the prison services.  The secret police. We are dehumanized and humiliated while in their clutches. We are frogmarched, searched  and sometimes seized and stripped. We become numbers; lumps of meat. Our society has created monsters in the wings waiting to enchain and enslave us when commanded so to do by the Hitler or Stalin of the modern age.

    Faceless men and woman roam at will with guns.  They keep us in line, push us shuffling towards what today might laughingly be called “transport” but could tomorrow so easily become the gas chamber.  Hundreds if not thousands of faceless officials are in support of those toting guns. Humor is strictly discouraged and a minor infraction of some petty rule will have you marched, arm twisted behind your back, to a dark guardroom and interrogation.

    If you attempt modern air travel, you will so easily understand why Hitler’s Germany was run by  clerks. Ordinary people who became institutionalized into monsters.  The station masters and train guards who transported the victims to the camps. The police who rounded up Jews and dissidents. The ordinary people, you and me, our neighbors who gave rise to the phrase “the banality of evil”: we are turning ourselves into Hitler’s railway clerks.  His Blackshirts. His Gestapo.

    The descent into totalitarianism is made so easy by modern technology.  What would Hitler have given for CCTV.  For a digitised society where our every move can be traced and tracked and minuted by automated software and replayed at whim whenever we are caught in some infidelity towards the hydra state.

    Am I exaggerating? Am I just feeling particularly down after a hateful day? I think not. The monolith I witnessed today could so easily be pressed into more sinister service. The common response of the common man after the Second World War was that there was nothing he could have done to stop the terror.

    And how right was that common man. Picture a group of strong men in control of modern media, the army, transport, banking. Our societies are so centralized, our freedoms so restricted that a gang of half determined thugs could walk all over us and we, the common men, could do nothing to resist them.

    Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.