Mystical Experience of Reality

There are certain activities or states of mind which trigger in me what Abraham Maslow calls “peak experiences”. Reading Keith Hancock’s Mystical Experience of Reality does just that.

I have been sitting in our beautiful cottage garden in the spring sunshine. The birds have been singing and all is well. Phrases in Keith’s book take me to treasured places and I really care little if this seems a mere flight of fancy.

I am in Narnia running ever on into greater and higher levels of Eden, alongside the lion, the children and all the talking animals. I am leaving Middle Earth with the elves, from the harbor at Grey Havens, travelling with them to their mythical and otherworldly origins. I am subliming with Ian M Banks to a transcendent realm outside of physical reality.

It is odd how merely reading about such states or places can often bring on feelings of being in them or at them. But there we go, that is the way I find it to be.

When reading Keith’s words, I feel a deep calling to that state of disembodied serenity I have so often felt of late. There is much I recognized in his book, so much which accords with my own eccentric journey into silence.

So much of what Keith says, so much of what he describes and the way he tells it rings true to me, speaks of the experiences I have felt of late.

Keith had a series of mystic experiences and in this book he describes both his own mystic experiences and quotes extensively from the writing of others on the subject. People have had such experiences throughout recorded history and have believed them to be an enlightenment, a release from the ordinary world, a glimpse of perfection and an afterlife. A state of existence where all is well and where sorrow, pain and hunger do not exist.

The big question for the skeptic is whether such experiences are “real”. I may feel that I have experienced an alternative (and better) state of reality but the scientists and materialists will inevitably dismiss such altered states of consciousness as merely manufactured by the brain. The brain receives sense input from the external world from which it creates a sense of “reality” in our waking life. Sight, sound, smell and touch are interpreted by the brain as a simulacrum of what is actually “out there”. An “interpretation”, not direct experience. The brain is interpreting the signals it receives and creating a “reality” which we assume roughly corresponds to what is out there in the physical world.

In dream states, we no longer rely on input from our senses but the brain nevertheless produces states which, while we are dreaming, we usually believe to be real.

The skeptic would argue that a mystical experience may be explained in a similar fashion – a dream state “imagined” or fashioned by the brain which does not represent any form of reality.

Keith and the mystics would argue strongly otherwise. To them the reality they experience while in a mystical state is, by contrast, more real than the physical world we normally interpret as “real”.

Not all scientists would disagree with the mystics. Some have the humility to admit that there is much about “reality” which we currently fail to grasp. To the layman it is incredible to learn from the scientists that “matter” as we customarily experience it does not exist – it is a collection of force-fields or strings of energy, not solid at all.

Now that is weird. Is it so much weirder to believe that reality is not as we customarily perceive it at all? Is it so far fetched to give credit to the possibility that certain people are able to see through to “ultimate” reality, a place of infinite fecundity and goodness from which we came and to which we will return?

This is not a subject I care to argue about. There really isn’t much point. The materialists and physicalists will get hot under the collar and call such a possibility absurd and ridiculous. They will usually deride and mock the mystic as a misguided and outdated fool who belongs back in the middle ages, when pixies lived at the bottom of our gardens and witches roamed the forests.

But some of us have a sense that the materialists may be understanding only part of life’s story. And we are joined by some of the more imaginative and less dogmatic scientists who concede that the universe remains a great mystery, some of the secrets of which may never be revealed by the scientific method.

In any event, I welcome Keith’s contribution to the debate and find his story accords with my own, shall we say, “wishes”!


  1. “certain people are able to see through to “ultimate” reality, a place of infinite fecundity and goodness from which we came and to which we will return?” I don’t perceive/imagine “it” this way. The ego is dissolved, forgotten (no word is adequate here), left behind. There is nothing to report upon returning to the ego state. Again, my perception/imagining.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, perhaps clumsily expressed on my part. It certainly isn’t a “place” in the geographical sense. Not somewhere to be got to or returned from. And the thinking mind as we know it has ceased to exist. A sense of awareness without thought. And yet upon return perhaps there is at least a memory or awareness of what the experience was like. Or thus it appeared to me at any rate! But who am I to say.


  2. I was intrigued by your descriptions of the differences between the materialist view and those who wish to acknowledge the reality of the mystical or ineffable as being “equally real.” Your willingness to allow your own inclinations to exist side-by-side with those more inclined toward the scientific reminded me of a passage from the autobiography of Carl Jung, entitled, “Memories, Dreams, Reflections.” In it he describes an astonishing “near death experience,” after a near-fatal heart attack in 1944, where he traveled astrally above the Earth, and met with disembodied beings, and was ultimately “called back” to return to his body by his physician.

    “I would never have imagined that any such experience was possible. It was not a product of imagination. The visions and experiences were utterly real; there was nothing subjective about them; they all had a quality of absolute objectivity…(and even though) we are strictly limited by our innate structure and therefore bound by our whole being and thinking to this world of ours…Mythic Man, to be sure, demands a ‘going beyond all that…to the emotions, however, it is a healing and valid activity; it gives existence a glamour which we would not like to do without. Nor is there any good reason why we should.”

    Jung consistently emphasized the validity and significance of our “unconscious,” recognizing that we live “day after day far beyond the bounds of our consciousness; without our knowledge, the life of the unconscious is also going on within us.” Those of us fortunate enough to have some degree of mystical experience like Keith, have a distinct advantage over someone without such exposure to the “objectively real” aspects of them, and cannot be informed “of things which by all logic we could not possibly know.”

    Jung’s autobiography was, at his request, only published in 1962, one year after his death in 1961, at the age of 86. He was an empiricist first and foremost his whole life, but apparently he had a number of extraordinary mystical experiences in his life, which he only felt safe recounting in the book he wrote about his life, in the last years of his life.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Fascinating. I have long realized that Jung is someone I ought to read but had no idea that he had had such experience himself, nor that he considered it “real”.
      ‘There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy’


    2. After having read much by and about C.G. Jung, I am currently reading “Catafalque: Carl Jung and the End of Humanity”, by Peter Kingsley. For me, it explains everything–but I was prepared by my previous readings and the lessons of a long life.


      1. An impressive book Ron. I’m not sure I could cope with it. I’m not sure if it is an onset of late life intellectual laziness or whether I am simply determined to seek the truth through my own experience. I spent an hour or so reading Plotinus this morning but I could just have easily heard similar theories from so very many authors. I admire your hard work and determination.


      1. Interestingly I believe I have made more progress while writing this foolish blog than I did in 30 years of reading esoterica. It’s all in the background in my mind and I have no doubt my studies have influenced my direction. But the last couple of years of writing and of being influenced by the likes if you, Keith and John have made me realize that in my case at least I know where I want to head and seem to be making progress along the path. I have made very real progress recently and genuinely seemed to have abandoned much of what the mystics tell us we must discard. I feel a lot better having done so. Of course I may simply be sitting at the top of a roller coaster facing a steep descent…. Or perhaps I have reached a different stage in my life. I am hoping for the latter.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s