Tag: Behavior

  • Getting it Badly Wrong

    Getting it Badly Wrong

    Reading through my last few posts I became very aware that I extended criticism over matters which should not trouble me. And that such criticism is neither kind nor warranted.

    If you want to retire from the world, which I most certainly do, then you should at least be gracious enough to let other people get on with their lives in the way they choose. Without offering frequent and unwarranted adverse comment.

    There are a number of things in the human world which infuriate me and yet I should be big enough and forgiving enough to simply ignore such irritation.

    If I wish to be a better person then it is foolish to harbour ill feelings about the behaviour of others. It is unjustified, unwarranted and harmful both to myself and to the victims of my ire.

    My frequent rants against the “religious” are largely a result of visits to evensong at my local High Church C of E establishment. Which I do solely to hear their superb choir and to indulge in the beautiful words of the Book of Common Prayer.

    The Vicar, while doubtless well meaning and good, does specialise in the sort of behaviour and mannerisms which I find less than helpful to my invariably irascible mood.

    The sermon (which I usually avoid by quietly slipping out down a side isle) is invariably depressing. And delivered in that oh so Church of England pious mode. A quiet and dismal voice tells me that the world is terrible and that we are all so sinful and have been ever since the mythical Eve was dumb enough to eat from the tree of knowledge. And many of my fellow “worshippers” are equally pious and oh so humble. Even if away from the sacred portal they are guilty of the most heinous sin. Like so many of those good priests unable to resist the lure of each other or the under age pupils supposedly in their care.

    We are then treated to a series of ghastly readings concerning an insane and vicious old testament god who does his best to make his people’s lives a misery. And we are supposed to see some relevance to our own lives and the condition of our awful species.

    I can take much of the Gospels and get meaning out of it. The Sermon on the Mount being top of the pops.

    But Acts and all the dreary Epistles simply don’t get my vote. A bunch of simpering crackpots telling me not to shag other people’s wives’ for the most part. Who are asinine enough to get themselves put down by the authorities for peddling their depressing drivel.

    But there I go, making the same mistake yet again.  Just because “worship” doesn’t get my vote there is no cause or justification in mocking others who quite sincerely take all that tosh as “gospel”.

    And so it goes on. Wokeness is something I particularly dislike. I am supposed to embrace 64 different genders and call people “them” or “they”. Or it. Or something.  I am supposed to rejoice in sexual variety I have no experience of and sing that I’m glad to be gay. Unless I grow or graft sexual organs other than those I was born with I am unworthy to read the Guardian or join the Labour Party.

    I must wring my hands in anguish and pay out vast sums of money all because some ghastly people several hundreds of years ago used fellow humans as slaves.  Horrible but that was then. And in any event, since the practice continues, let’s stop it now rather than whining about what happened hundreds of years ago.

    Oh, and then there is a current religion which is growing like billyo which I’m not supposed to mention except in tones of admiration and quiescence. Despite the fact that what was once something very fine indeed has become a hideous instrument of terror and repression in the hands of politically inspired madmen. Whose most extreme adherents treat women as fifth class citizens and who beat and rape and torture all those who disagree with their savage and backward law.

    Hmm…what else do I loathe and despise about the world. Well, most of it I guess. Or rather anything which touches on the human race.

    I’m very happy with birds and bees and butterflies and natural beauty.

    But there you see is my error. I am allowing my own likes and dislikes to make me into something just as unpleasant and unacceptable as those that I criticise.

    It’s a human failing of course but one that must be overcome if one wishes to live up to one’s ideals.

    I have often stated that I am not as such a “good” person and that becomes only too evident when I look at my own attitudes and behaviour. But at least I recognise it as wrong. Which must surely go some way to redress the balance in favour of my fractured and imperfect soul.

    Note to self: “Must try harder”.

  • Original thinking or garbled trope?

    Original thinking or garbled trope?

    I am interested in expressing my own thoughts and reading the original thoughts of others. But too often writers feel obliged to offer up a digest or synthesis of what they have read rather than contributing anything new or original.

    I am well aware that my own thoughts have been deeply informed by others. I am often unconscious of that fact when expressing myself. Yet I try to voice feelings and opinions which are genuinely my own.

    What use if I merely quote Liebnitz or any of my other favorites? Better that than Trump or any of the other boorish ignoramuses of our time, but less of a contribution to society than something fresh.

    It is far from easy to dig deep into one’s psyche and to offer anything new. Indeed, if you were to believe Ecclesiastes, you would come to the conclusion that there is nothing new.

    And yet there assuredly is and from time to time a philosophy or view will pop out which is genuinely and alarmingly fresh.

    Often as not the new will usher in something every bit as dystopian as the new of old, but just occasionally something genuinely useful and peaceful but also revolutionary may emerge.

    Or that is my hope. I was reading through blogs on counter culture this morning. Whatever that expression means. I often consider anarchy, socialism, religious thought and even occasionally conventional centrist politics.  Without much satisfaction.

    There must be some good to be had somewhere. This morning I was reading an article from Sue Stevenson at Discombobula.

    Whether she was joking or not, she suggested that politicians in Australia be served magic mushrooms on toast.

    Researchers announced a few years ago that the psilocybin in magic mushrooms has the ability to foster “sustained changes in outlook and political perspective” for people suffering depression. Even better, those changes are “in the direction of increased nature relatedness and decreased authoritarianism.”

    Now there is an original thought, although I imagine a few of the Flower Power mob back in the 60’s felt much the same way. Which, according to lore, was why psychedelics were banned back in the day. Some say because the newly awakened young were refusing to enlist for the Vietnam war following their psychedelic enlightenment.

    But wait. Do not pass go, do not shut me down in fury and derision. For our Sue has a serious point whether she meant it or not.

    Let me explain. We are the slaves of our Darwinian origins, our evolution. Even the mildest of us will fight tooth and nail for our own survival, when push comes to shove.  We will trample over people on our way to the lifeboats on the Titanic, we will kill and maim and abuse any who stand in our way.

    I am unable to suppress often felt irritation over all manner of things. Which is all very well when I am locked away in my hermetic recreation of Skellig Michael. Faced more closely with my fellow man, I am prone to behave less charitably than I would like. And I am no Ghengis Khan, no Donald Trump. I have no desire to dominate or conquer. I just want to be left alone, as Garbo is reputed to have said.

    My point is that we need to recreate ourselves.  We need to escape from our origins or no amount of good thought or deed will make for a better or kinder world.

    We have had good religious thought for as long as man has existed and when you strip away the claptrap of belief, much of it has something useful to say about how to live in peace with each other.

    But we can not. We did not evolve to live in peace with each other or our planet. We were bred, like the rest of the animal kingdom, for survival – ours – at the expense of everybody else’s.

    And so back to Sue.

    The out of the box, the unusual, the un-thought of.  That is what interests me. Re-engineering our genome, altering our emotions for the better. Increasing our good qualia and reducing our bad.

    Good on you Sue. I agree with you.

     

  • 12 Ways to Wipe Your Butt

    12 Ways to Wipe Your Butt

    Why do the cretinous like numbered lists? And why do they annoy me so much?

    I was asked to write a chapter for a book on investment a while ago along with people who, unlike myself, knew what they were talking about.

    The publisher asked me to write about my 10 investing rules. Piqued by the absurdity of the  idea I wrote 8 rules instead but I could just as easily have chosen 1 or 15.

    For some reason I have a bee in my bonnet at the moment about Jordan Peterson who opines that there are 12 Rules For Life.  Perhaps it is just that I am jealous of his success? There again probably not – it must be exhausting to be in demand.

    This particular clinical psychologist offers books, “podcasts” (whatever they are) and general existentialist thoughts on every aspect of life and the universe. Or do I mean 13 aspects? Or 5 1/2?

    As a shrink perhaps Jordan could tell me why there are 12 Rules for Life? Or did his publisher just think the title was catchy and there were 12 apostles? Or was it 11 because that rotter Judas doesn’t count?

    Why 40 days in the wilderness? Surely 10 would have done the job?

    A cursory look at Google produces the following equally banal lists:

    • 30 Ways to Die
    • 12 Ways to Get to 11
    • 7 Ways to Maximize Misery
    • 7 Ways to Maximise a Fart
    • 130 Ways to Fill a Notebook
    • 16 Ways to Kill a Vampire at McDonalds

    Note that I have used a list! This is my “6 ways to point out the absurdity of numbered lists”.

    Is there a point to all this? Am I going anywhere or just driveling?

    Well I think there must be a point somewhere, if only I can find it. I’ll have a shot.

    We humans need certainty. We need codification. We like to explain the universe in terms of mathematics, and indeed that is the only way so to do.

    By writing a chapter containing 8 investment Rules I am giving people the certainty they crave. I am telling them that if they employ exactly 8 Rules in their investment strategy (my rules) they will achieve success.  What nonsense; how misleading.

    And so back to Dr Peterson. His theory is that just as there were 12 (or 11) apostles, there are 12 (or is it 13?) “Rules for Life”.  It makes people think there really are 12 Rules and that following them will lead to everlasting Joy And Happiness.

    Take the Kabbalah. It’s all about numbers. The mysticism of numbers. In numbers we will find our answers. 42 is the Answer to the Meaning of Life the Universe and Everything!

    Or take Buddhism: it has a Noble 8-Fold Path. Not 7 fold or 6. Or 5 1/2 but 8. Get a decimal point wrong and you will fall from the path and fail to reach Nibbana. Oh – and there are 4 Noble Truths!

    There is a place for the certitude of numbers and it is in the scientific endeavor.  The number of atoms in helium or strontium. The age of the universe. The rotations of the earth around our sun.

    There is no place for numbers in the messy and chaotic world of human behavior.

    So the next time some clever clogs tells you there are “12 Ways to Wipe Your Butt” the correct response is:

    “Bollox”.

     

     

  • Cast Out the Beam

    Cast Out the Beam

    It seems so inordinately difficult to be a decent human being, unless you were born that way.

    I suppose some people just are? In fact I can think of one or two Goody Two Shoes who are genuinely nice people. I have to assume they were born nice since I have never seen them behave other than with a complete absence of malice.

    Nice people exist and they are definitely not boring. They just don’t say horrid things and think horrid thoughts. By and large, anyway.

    Why are some of us trouble makers and Wicked Pixies, even if we don’t really want to be? I don’t really mean any ill but I get intensely irritated and obsessive about people who annoy me or who I consider to be bullies.

    If someone really pisses me off, they take over my mind. It’s not that I wish them any harm but I seem to need to tell them in no uncertain manner that they are plonkers. Or worse. Pigs maybe? Smarmy salesmen? Snobs?

    But how objective am I being? Probably not very. By their own standards, those who annoy me in such ways are probably acting perfectly reasonably.

    Is it SO terrible to suck up to people? Don’t we all perhaps do that, to some extent? Is it so terrible to to conduct minor swindles on your family, friends and neighbors? After all, evolution made this compulsory for those who are in the least bit worried about survival.

    And frankly, lets face it, business is usually about swindling people. Commerce as ritualized violence.

    Perhaps such people are just “getting a good deal”? Or perhaps they are in fact taking only that to which they are justly entitled and we have misinterpreted the situation.

    The reality is that some of us should just hide ourselves away somewhere remote. If, as I would like, I were to be tucked up in some cabin off grid, I wouldn’t have to worry about being nice to people or worrying that I have got it wrong.

    And I certainly wouldn’t have to feel guilty about calling people bullies, snobs, smarmy salesmen and the like. Unless I took against the local fauna and insulted a grisly or a wolf.

    Hey, I wonder if that’s what those desert madmen were all about? The nutters who lived on pinnacles of rock in the middle of deserts? Maybe they weren’t holy men at all? Maybe they were just miserable old shytes like me who didn’t like having neighbors?

  • Could Adolf have chosen to behave differently?

    Could Adolf have chosen to behave differently?

    We assess animal behavior better than we do that of humans. We are more realistic where we can analyse with objectivity.  Our own behavior remains largely a mystery to us.

    As does the question of changing that behavior. On an individual or species wide basis.

    Pavlov’s dog aside we do not expect, largely, to change the nature or behavior of an animal. Why should we expect to change our own?

    Animals have basic needs. They are coded to survive, they have evolved to compete. They seek food and they seek mates. Perhaps they have a desire (conscious or not) to welcome pleasure and to avoid pain. Perhaps some are more sociable than others, some more conscious, some less, depending on the complexity of their brains.

    But you would not expect much mercy from a hungry wolf, you would certainly not expect it to feel any guilt or shame when it rips your throat out.  Not today and not tomorrow.  The Big Bad Wolf is not going to change.

    Change, if it does occur takes place over many thousands of years. Or longer. Sometimes no change occurs even  through millions of years – take the cockroach as an example, or the shark.

    As a counter example take the wolf’s distant offspring – the dog. Trained  by humans over thousands of years dogs have become (by and large!) a little less violent, a little more friendly.  Over thousands of years!

    Yes, yes I am aware of experiments where rats are encouraged by trick or treat tactics to press one button or another, but I am interested as ever in the possibility of human change. Redemption even.

    Do we have the power to pull ourselves up by our own bootstraps in our own lifetime? As an individual or a species?

    No, I would venture most definitely not. Nurture and nature yes, spout the phrase all you will. But my strong (and yes, subjective) suspicion is that our behavior is largely endogenous.  Built in.

    Mother Teresa’s are born not fashioned. Adolf was born a murderer and tyrant, albeit his behavior may have been accentuated by his time in the trenches and his failure as an artist.  That he got where he did was a matter, largely, of chance.  Had his luck been less blatant he may have remained a small time nutter in some lowly Austrian town.

    In many thousands of years’ time we may have trained ourselves to behave better because we want to.  Or we may crack our own code and achieve improvement sooner.

    But this week, this decade, my firm belief is that we are stuck with who we are. Collectively and individually.

  • Bingeing on Netflix

    Bingeing on Netflix

    As deadly sins go, bingeing on Netflix probably ranks among the less serious.

    It isn’t something I feel guilty about as I skulk off into the spare bedroom on occasions when my wife says “lights out”. Well, not too guilty anyway although depending on extent of the binge I might find myself a bit grumpy the next morning.

    I suppose though that like most things in life, bingeing on entertainment has a lesson to teach if we care to listen.

    It’s not something I feel ashamed of (no need for that, surely?) nonetheless it does put me in mind of other (more venal sins) that I might have been guilty of in the past.  And the memory of those does worry me, notwithstanding the fact that I managed to escape irreparable damage and don’t do it anymore.

    You have to wonder whether the Nanny State is planning legislation on the matter; after all it seeks to control every other aspect of our waking lives.

    Every one of us must be guilty of committing some minor infraction every day.  We fail to sort our rubbish into appropriate piles like good eco-warriors.  We flush our loos late into the night (a real cause for worry in Switzerland where a neighbour once set the lavatory noise inspectors on us).  We are obese, we fail to use enough fluorine brushing our teeth, we are not sexually diverse enough, we are not gender aware.  We aren’t multi-cultured, we stick to the narrow traditions and religion of our birth place.

    Yep, I can see it coming – I will turn on Netflix one day and I will get a notice flashing across the screen (in Kermit green) telling me I have already had my permitted 40 minutes viewing time for the day.  The program shuts itself down.

    There is a serious case to be made that the state has transgressed its boundaries but I can’t see a retreat anytime soon.

    So enjoy it while you can; it can’t last!  Nanny McPhee is coming to switch you off.