Tag: Meaning

  • Seeking Meaning

    Seeking Meaning

    Deep in meditative trance a voice, my own perhaps, told me that I sought a god and had always done so.

    The surprise was that I was surprised. Perhaps it was a sort of “coming out”. If that voice spoke the truth, and I have little reason to doubt it, then small wonder that a commercial life was an anathema to my soul.

    I sat listening to the rain, pattering somewhere in my consciousness. There was a door or a barrier somewhere. Perhaps I was the wrong side of the tracks. Just the other side lay the infinite.

    Do I anthropomorphize? No but I seek communication, communion if you will. At one stage I was in an empty theater, a Shakespearean image if ever there was one.

    All the world’s a stage,
    And all the men and women merely players;

    Was the god I sought the director of such theater I wondered? I thought perhaps he might be. Was there anyone there in that emptiness? Who had built, designed and ran that theater. The answer was always on the tip of my tongue. Like a half forgotten memory, which needed just a little prodding to be brought back into the camera of my mind.

    Are we a simulation perhaps, are we the men in Plato’s cave. All seemed possible. God was never quite found, or was he?

    “Are we what you are seeking?” I seemed to hear. Yes, you will do I replied. Talk to me, show yourselves.

    Were those voices the Omega Point? I rather fancied they were. You see, a technological god will do me just fine.

    Anything omniscient, wise, beneficent. Omnipotent would be quite handy too. Something vastly bigger that what we normally perceive in our messed up world of concretized struggle.

    Is my god that of Abraham or Mohamed? The question seemed irrelevant. Was I god I wondered, or, more properly put, was I an offshoot of some universal consciousness of which we are all a part.

    The joy of meditation is the freedom from convention and thought. I feel, therefor I am. To misquote Descartes.

    Out of meditation I still listen for those voices. In the wind, in quiet incantations in a temple, in silence and the panoply of a starry night.

    But I am an eclectic sort of fellow and can see beauty everywhere, even in the little maths I am able to grasp. In the wonder of fractals seen in the design of a tree, its roots and leaves. In the bang which we are told kicked us all off and in the whimper they say is our ending.

    Were I young again and could choose a different path, it might have been that of the physicist. There is a stark, ethereal beauty there too, a search for meaning of not such a different order.

    If there is a god, he hides in the cracks, in letters written in lemon juice between the lines on a page. Perhaps the physicist will discover him silently existing at the center of an ultimate singularity, or wrapped in some exotic field of yet unthought of energy. In a dimension we do not yet know of. A life form divorced from what we conceive of as the physical universe.

    Many a physicalist will sneer these days at a such a search. Materialism is the fashion and the universe can only be explained in terms of what it does, not what it means. It was not always thus and there are still physicists who dream with greater ambition, people who are prepared to ask why and not content themselves merely to count and calculate.

    At my age I must remain a mere dreamer; the time for doing seems long gone. But where would we be without such dreams? The world will not be bettered by science alone. No “for profit” titan will create a heaven for all, merely a glory for one.

    There is a place still for the hermit, sitting in silence and listening for quiet voices in the gentle winds. There is purpose in listening, even in a world where all seems driven by material ambition.

    There is meaning to be found by looking with serene detachment and contemplating what is and what might yet be.

  • The Past is a Foreign Country

    The Past is a Foreign Country

    They do things differently there. Or do they? Man’s real fear is of the unknowable future.

    I was sitting in a quiet Wimbledon garden chatting to my two lovely nieces. One is an undergraduate studying classics at Oxford and the other hopes to go to Durham shortly to read English. Bright, wonderful little sparks of life they do not possess an ounce of malice between them and in their quiet company I can often feel at peace with the world

    We were discussing Roman literature and suddenly the glorious security and certainty of reading Cicero, Livy or Pliny struck me forcibly.

    Whatever we say about re-interpreting the past, it is difficult to deny the veracity of the written word. Fools and knaves may deny the holocaust but it would take a bigger fool indeed to look at the works of a classical author, copied faithfully throughout the centuries, and claim he did not write them.

    Thus, whatever re-interpretation pushy academics may place upon the words of a classical author, it is reasonably certain that many of these works remain as written. It remains the case as it has done for the past two thousand years.

    There is thus a security in reading such works. This happened, that happened. This is how this author felt about his world, his life. His writing is a fly in amber, a fossil record, a tablet written in stone. Immutable.

    Einstein may have posited time to be non existent; that past, present and future do not flow. But it is not so for we mere mortals. If the future is knowable, we do not know it.

    How we long for gnosis, for revelation. How many questions there are for which we have eternally sought answers. How consistent and poignant our search for meaning in a capricious universe. How numerous the grand theories of reality we have invented to comfort ourselves. The gods, the voids, the nirvanas.

    Do we find comfort in such things? Perhaps we do; the mystic would certainly claim so. Some of us are lucky enough to have had glimpses through the doors of perception; or at least to believe so.

    We look for certainty in the past and can find great comfort in its famliliar and sometimes warm embrace. The very stones of Oxford itself breathe a kind of warmth, a blanket of security and beauty. There was I too, many years ago, reading history in those ancient hallowed halls. Walking those paths where scholars have walked for nigh on a thousand years.

    Feeling continuity, peace, a sense that all is well.

    Do I seek the same thing in my beloved country churches? A sense that even if the future is unknowable, I can at least wrap myself in the familiar clothing of Norman arches and ancient stained glass windows.

    Far from being a foreign country, I would argue to my nieces that the past is a present comfort to us. That we can derive joy and meaning from our living history and use it to help us see our place in our vast and ever changing universe.

    Not so that we become ossified, not so that we find ourselves fossilised in these ancient writings and stones. But so that we can congratulate ourselves on some of our better achievements, our greater glories. So that we can more clearly see our past mistakes and look to a brighter if unknowable future. Where there we may indeed hope to do things differently.

  • Seek and You shall Find

    Seek and You shall Find

    In the mental world, in our interior “reality” we can find whatever we want. Whatever we are looking for.

    For us this may appear to be reality. And indeed this is “our” reality. But it would be a great mistake to assume that others share that reality. It would be an even greater mistake to impose our “reality” on theirs.

    If you are seeking “god” you are likely to find him. Or her or…it…or some cross gender thingummy-bob. If you are seeking meaning in emptiness as do those in the East, again you are likely to find it.

    If you seek to deny meaning, yours will be a frightening reality but you will find it nonetheless. You will find empty, barren nothingness if that is your wont. Perhaps that is what depression is.

    I would not care to dispute the meaning which people have found. Just so long as they can accept that it is their meaning and that while some others may share it, it is almost certainly not any sort of universal truth.

    I do believe in certain absolutes but again I must probably accept that these things just appear to me as absolutes. And that others will deny their applicability. Good and evil – what are these except stories we have told ourselves? Do they really exist in the material universe? Well I believe so, but I wager you will find an equal number who do not. Perhaps good and evil exist only in the mind. In the absence of sentience good and evil can surely have no meaning?

    I have quoted love and the abolition of suffering as moral imperatives. Many will ridicule such an assertion, and, who knows, perhaps rightly. Perhaps they are absolutes merely in the minds of those who seek them.

    For those of us with minds which are not too damaged (mine probably just about qualifies) we will find what we want to find. I seek peace, in a metaphorical as well as literal sense. In all shades of meaning. Quiet, absence of conflict, a place “Where the green swell is in the havens dumb, And out of the swing of the sea”.

    And to a large extent I have found it.

    Others seek turmoil and conquest, noise and battle (commercial or physical). And that is no so difficult to find; it is around every corner.

    Universally applicable or not, subjective or objective, the internal machinations of our mind leak out into the exterior world. Our thoughts become words. Our words become deeds.

    I don’t suppose my detractors would find such a statement too controversial.

    And so if my mind believes in the nothing, in the meaningless of all things, then it is not just my life which will become meaningless. People may read what I write, my family will notice my behavior and my actions, as will everyone I come into contact with. They will be affected (and badly) by my infectious pessimism.

    And so yes, from thought great good and appalling evil, or even simple banality, arises. Especially if we are the sort of energetic fool who insists on proselytizing our internal states to the world at large. Personally, I have neither the energy nor the charisma. Let alone the desire.

    But for those who do, the logos becomes reality writ large. What starts as a quiet thought in a single mind, what starts as a cankered and twisted desire can all too soon become not only the reality of the mind which created it, but that of countless others as well.

    In the beggining was the word (or thought). Seek and you shall find.

    Eventually. Whatever it is you are looking for. But let everyone seek and find for themselves.

  • Wittgenstein’s ladder: to climb or not to climb?

    Wittgenstein’s ladder: to climb or not to climb?

    The happiest are those who have never heard of Wittgenstein’s Ladder.  If asked, they assume it’s something you buy in Homebase.

    As with the existentialists, I am way past caring what the sad fellow meant by it. It has become part of my own lore; I have interpreted it as I  see fit and in a way I find useful.

    My own interpretation is as follows. I have spent my entire life questioning, worrying, looking for answers which do not exist.  Recently I have decided to kick the ladder away as Wittgenstein recommends, realizing that most of what I had learnt was useless, peripheral nonsense.

    The question therefore is should I have begun the climb in the first place or should I have burnt the ladder and not bothered?

    I have engaged in a search for meaning in a sea of random noise. A search for pattern where none exists. A master of arts in history from a venerable English university, a qualification in the law.  And endless study, even after those few initial years. The philosophers, from the ancient Greeks to David Chalmers and those who ponder consciousness. Religion and the charming tales of the ancient desert Jews, who believed they had found the one true god. The Epic of Gilgamesh, Confucius, the Tao.  The Odyssey.  The Bhagavad Gita, the Christian mystics.  And more latterly a serious if uninformed interest in science.

    Here is what Wittgenstein said:

    My propositions serve as elucidations in the following way: anyone who understands me eventually recognizes them as nonsensical, when he has used them—as steps—to climb beyond them. (He must, so to speak, throw away the ladder after he has climbed up it.)   He must transcend these propositions, and then he will see the world aright.

    6.54

    Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

    Most of what I have read has turned out, on reflection, to be unhelpful at best.  The world, and in particular the human condition does not have to be seen in terms of absurd complexity.

    We do not have to ponder our origins or that of the universe and most spend a lifetime not doing so. They are the clever ones, even if they do not know it.

    Despite the acceleration of science in my own lifetime, we are still an infinity from the sort of questions I would like to have answered. Progress seems glacial for those with a finite lifetime.

    The cure for cancer never quite comes in time. The Higgs Boson, while eventually unearthed, does not actually do very much for my sense of well-being or understanding.  The New Scientist contains almost identical articles week after week which are mostly questions rather than answers.

    The answer is to avoid the questions.  Ludwig was right all along.

  • The Doors of Perception

    The Doors of Perception

    If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro’ narrow chinks of his cavern.

    William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell

    Is it so strange that a deep interest in science should be combined with an equally deep desire for mysticism and transcendance?

    I think not; the two can be seen as two sides of the same coin.  Reality seen both from the intellect and from the senses. A yearning for transcendance.  Some would say a desire to escape from the base reality.   Which is all that is accessible to most of us in a “normal” state of mind.

    Both science and mysticism offer us infinity. Infinite space and power. Infinite universes and time. Teleportation, downloading the mind into another form of matter, eternal life, time travel. Science is not ashamed to speculate on such matters. To an ancient people, we would appear as gods. In the far future, or in a distant corner of the multiverse, there exists intelligence with powers which even we would consider godlike.

    The mind allows us to travel to such places and such times. To witness infinity,  to feel the mind of “god”.

    These days, few rational men believe in traditional religious systems.  And yet through the ages the mystics have had glimpses of some alternate truth, some reality which in our ordinary minds is denied to us.

    Science struggles to explain consciousness and yet some scientists tell us that consciousness is a law of nature all of its own. That consciousness “is”.

    Not that consciousness is an emergent property of physical elements.  But that consciousness is a law of physics itself.  Universal consciousness, consciousness as the very “self” of the universe.

    So listen to how the mystics describe their experiences.

    Meister Eckhart:

    “To the quiet mind all things are possible. What is a quiet mind? A quiet mind is one which nothing weighs on, nothing worries, which, free from ties and from all self-seeking, is wholly merged into the will of God and dead to its own.”

    Alan Watts:

    “What you are basically, deep, deep down, far, far in, is simply the fabric and structure of existence itself.”

    Siddhartha:

    “The mind is everything. What you think you become.”

    Both science and contemplation seek knowledge.  Self knowledge, truths, the “truth”.

    Science uses instruments and machinery and conducts experiments. Science seeks truth through the intellect.

    The quiet mind seeks experience directly.  To feel the truth, to experience it.

    Neither should be disparaged. Both should be embraced. Neither is complete without the other.

  • Euthanasia

    Euthanasia

    Every human has the right to take his or her own life and the means to do so painlessly and swiftly should be made easily and openly available.

    Modern medicine, powerful as it may be, has a long way to go before we can be repaired.  The all too common end for many of us is months or years of suffering with incurable disease.  The horror of pain is often accompanied by immobility, loss of cognitive facilities, incontinence and great indignity.  No coup de grace is allowed until the very last moment when the patient is unable to take water or food.

    The whole question is surrounded by taboo, ignorance, superstition, religious claptrap and humbug.  Pure unenlightened barbarism.  A disgrace and an insult to the intelligence.

    The fear that assisted suicide may be abused and used for murder is remote and absurd. Murder will take place anyway. Many a fully qualified doctor has been known to commit murder (and not as a mercy killing). Guns are freely available even in countries where such weapons are illegal and in any event the avenues and opportunities for the dedicated murder abound.  This is no excuse.

    And as for the religious nutcases- grow up, we live in the 21st century and if your non existent deity hadn’t made such mess of creation we would not be in this fix anyway.

    So yes, I am cross and anxious and fearful. I have seen a mother take ten years to die from dementia, while her cognisance and then her body slowly stopped working, until at the very last she became a croaking husk unable to take food or water. What kind of end is that?

    I have seen relatives and friends suffer the indignity of connection to machinery to pass bodily wastes while months pass by in a semi vegetative state.

    I do not want to end my life with a whimper. I do not wish to be an embarrassing burden on anyone around me especially to those to whom I have been a husband or father.

    I have a right not to endure such disgusting indignity and will exercise that right when the time comes. I shall end my life when, how and as I choose.  So should you.

    The law is an ass.