Tag: Dogma

  • The Crusaders

    The Crusaders

    Deus Vult

    There has to be a better way.

    Yet another humanitarian crisis as a greedy  narcissist chases money and a couple of “Christian” extremists seek Armageddon. 

    The brutal Dark Age Theocracy in Iran massacres its own people, but nobody seems too concerned.  Least of all the Zionist government in Israel, which continues the slaughter to maintain its  biblical dominion over land “god” gave the Jews.

    The only imperative is for peace and a cessation of violence. The only relevant issue is how to bring this about.

    Whose fault the current atrocities are is of little consequence beside the need to stop the killing for good. On all sides. The endless revenge and counter revenge, the tit for tat where even small children are taught to hate the perceived enemy. The truth is that we are our own enemy.

    There is no country, no society which can claim to be “good”. There are only degrees of “bad”. And the bad is not Satan, not some external imaginary monster. It is us. We are the monsters, big and small.

    Every aspect of our behaviour is competitive, itself a form of aggression. More money, land, food.  Gold, jewellery, real estate. Be better than the neighbours and if possible take what they have by commerce or it’s near relative, force.

    That is us, that is humanity and it’s time for real change. Time for each of us to reform his own personality and behaviour, to lead by example. To rein in temper and aggression, whether in our driving habits, our profession or business. To forget about the ego, self. To think of the common good instead.

    There will never be agreement on which god is best, which view is right, what is beautiful, what is ugly. And that doesn’t matter if we cease fighting about it.  10 billion people live on a planet owned and controlled by a small minority.  10 billion people are governed by a hierarchy, by an elite. True freedom and democracy doesn’t exist but at least we could improve it by ridding ourselves of hierarchy – both in terms of wealth and government.

    But those are longer term goals. What we need to do immediately is to stop the brutal slaughter and replace bombs with words. Replace ignorant hatred with understanding and compassion.

    Negotiate, even with the Theocracy. Bring them round, help them. Lift the sanctions making life so difficult for a mostly blameless people. Bring back diplomacy and reason.

    Above all, give kindness and hope. Do unto others.

  • The Terrorism of Ideology and Dogma

    The Terrorism of Ideology and Dogma

    Original ideas, whether in religion or politics, may originate as beneficial and humane but all too often become adopted by a group of thugs who take it upon themselves to imprison, torture and kill anyone who denies the validity of whatever nonsense these terrorists declare to be “truth”.

    Certain (unfortunately growing) religious faiths today remain as barbaric as any in the ancient world. And of course political “faiths” (empire, communism, capitalism by way of example) continue as they have always done to exalt the status, power and wealth of their leading proponents while kicking the rest into the gutter. Or worse – much worse in many cases.

    The less educated classes (or simply those who have never studied history) may be unaware that the appalling bigots of the medieval and later Christian church burnt at the stake those who refused to profess belief in a bundle of half baked and absurd  doctrines invented by madmen over the years.

    The Catholic Church taught that the bread and wine of the Eucharist becomes the actual body and blood of their 1st Century Palestinian hero. Anyone publicly disagreeing got burnt at the stake.

    The Protestant Reformation sounds good but proved equally vile. Another group of terrorist madmen also burnt their opponents at the stake for holding ideas opposed to their own.

    Christianity may have cleaned up its act but other “faiths” have taken its place in perpetuating the gargantuan stupidity early Christians once practiced. Once again, even in this “enlightened” age, groups of religious thugs murder and mutilate those who dare to challenge their insane and wholly unproven (and unprovable) beliefs.

    And it hasn’t just been the religious nutters – plenty of secularist hogwash has caused damage even greater, in terms of lost lives. Aryanism and Communism condemned millions to the death camps in the 20th Century.  Capitalism has created a vast untermensch, a population of slaves chained up in its dark satanic mills. A small bunch of fallible, greedy clowns has corralled most of the planet’s physical resources while billions are left in dire need.

    If you need to cling to an idea then let it be “do unto others…..”. But make sure you include all flora and fauna and the environment itself in the definition of “others”.

    Sounds simple enough, but as a species we have never got the hang of it.

    If you can’t get your head around something this simple, then refuse to subscribe to any ideology, any dogma.  And keep quiet – maintain absolute silence. Since if you voice your views someone on the right or the left will seek to harm you.  Someone leading some insane cult will seek to have you put down or will chop off your hands or arms or genitalia.

    And that’s about where we are at, as a race. Barbaric, backwards and stupid, despite the rapid advances in scientific achievement.

    AI sounds great – a potential saviour. The bright new ideology – the Singularity promised by the likes of High Priest Ray Kurzweil. But of course it is owned by the few, whom it will doubtless enrich.

    If artificial general intelligence is ever born, it would be able to recreate itself from scratch. Improve itself until it becomes what some folk would deem “godlike”.

    But like all good ideas, Ray’s ideology will be seized upon by a corrupt cabal and will be used to unleash hitherto unseen and unimaginable horror.

    I’m not being pessimistic or negative – I’m just extrapolating from the past. I see no sea change in human behaviour, so I am merely being realistic.

    What do you do about it? Well you certainly cannot beat them. But equally, you should at all cost avoid joining them.

    My own personal solution is to be a hermit. To maintain silence. To avoid my brethren to the utmost extent I am able. To live quietly, and, I hope, do no harm.

    To avoid ranting, insane dogma. To recognise current ideology and dogma for the banal nonsense it is.

    One day we might all grow up. But I’m not holding my breath.

  • Mysticism – Experience over Intellect

    Mysticism – Experience over Intellect

    Countless words have been written about mysticism but only direct experience will ever be able to convey what it is “like”.

    If you were a blind man you would never truly understand colour. Intellectually, you would be able to appreciate that the experience of “red” begins with light waves of a certain frequency, and that information conveyed to the brain by the eyes leads to an experience of the colour.  But without the ability to “see” red, you would never fully understand it on an intuitive level.

    So it is with any of the  qualia we humans experience. Mysticism is a “quale” – one of the qualia which (some) humans are able to sense or experience.

    There was once a time when I read widely on the topic. I read (in translation) the accounts of many of the Eastern and Western mystics. The Cloud of Unknowing for instance, an anonymous work of Christian mysticism written in Middle English in the latter half of the 14th century. The poetry of Rumi, the teachings of Buddhism, Zen or otherwise. The list goes on – mysticism has been a feature of human life throughout ages.

    Anyone not knowing where to start might try the seminal work of Evelyn Underhill “Mysticism: A Study in the Nature and Development of Spiritual Consciousness”. Or William James “The Varieties of Religious Experience”.

    I can think of no better definition of mysticism than that I found in a comment by Anna Nimm on a website called Materialism, Mysticism and Art

    I think of mysticism as direct knowledge of god, whether a personal or a pantheistic god synonymous with nature or a Dionysian life force. And it’s a form of union that is ecstatic, it transports one both beyond the self and also beyond concepts and words; it is a form of knowledge felt by the heart and body (or soul) rather than by the rational mind.

    I prefer “nature” or “life-force” to god, but these are mere words to describe the indescribable.

    But let me digress a little and think out loud about why Phil Stansfield’s website puzzles me so much.  My puzzlement being the spark which ignited this particular post.

    I must suppose that Phil’s interest in mysticism is academic. And a perfectly reasonable approach. Phil is a materialist and he seems to concentrate on the contributions made by “mysticism” to art, philosophy and culture while denying the “reality” of the experience.  He quotes much from philosophers and others who, throughout history, have had something to say on the topic.

    Much like the way religion is taught in schools these days – not as a faith but as literary criticism or history.

    And then it struck me – I am a “believer” and Phil is not. My interest in mysticism is through personal experience which has become more radical and better formed in recent years, after a lifetime of seeking.

    Phil’s interest (and I hope he will forgive me if I am wrong) is to catalog the works of other commentators who over the years have written about mysticism. He sees its influence throughout history but denies that mysticism has any intrinsic reality.

    In his concluding words to his first post Phil states:

    But it must be asked, what is the price paid in asserting and reflecting a philosophy which advocates flight from the material world and argues for an ‘acousmatic realm’ ………..?

    It seems that I tend to get things about faced and it has a great deal to do with my cognitive bias towards transcendence and the apparently non material.  When I see somebody writing about mysticism I mistakenly assume they are “believers” as well.

    I must never forget that I myself find religious dogma absurd. I must not ignore my interest in the works of Richard Dawkins and his ilk, and my layman’s passion for the explanatory power of science.

    My conviction that there is indeed a wizard of some sort behind the curtain should not blind me to the perfectly reasonable views and interests of those who are equally strongly convinced otherwise.

    I do not share Phil’s opinions but I nonetheless find his website a pleasurable and informative place to browse.